: Children in detention
Let the children walk in these shoes
Frank Brennan SJ AO
Sydney Town Hall Rally
10 June 2004
The 162 pairs of shoes remind us why we are here to walk the talk.
We are here for the children who cannot be with us, because they
are behind the razor wire. These empty shoes force all of us to
ask two questions:
- Why would you want to put children behind razor wire?
- Why would you want to break up families, separating children
from their parents?
Most Australians would agree: You should only detain children or
separate them from their parents if there is a very good reason.
What is that reason? Post September 11, there may be good reason
for detaining even a child who arrives on our shores without documentation
but only for the briefest of times while we determine who they are
and while we determine that they are not a health risk or a security
But once we have decided those things, why would we keep asylum
seekers in detention? Why would we keep children behind razor wire?
Why would we separate children from their parents? We deserve an
answer. We demand an answer. Alas there is no answer other than
bureaucratic convenience and government's desire for popularity.
Mr Ruddock used to tell us this detention was not punishment or
deterrence. So why do we do it? Amanda Vanstone tells us that she
does not want these people living in the community, able to father
children to Australian citizens. That is no reason keep a child
in detention. Amanda Vanstone tells us that people in detention
send the right message on their mobile phones to family and friends,
"Don't come to Australia". But isn't that deterrence?
Hasn't the High Court said you cannot do that? Hasn't Mr Ruddock
told us that is not the reason? The government says the detention
helps with the processing of refugee claims. But it doesn't. It
hinders good decision making. The government's own statistics show
If the government cannot give us a good reason for detaining the
children, 92% of whom have been proved to be refugees, why don't
we release them and all other asylum seekers into the community
while their claims are processed? If someone is a flight risk, then
why shouldn't government be required to take them before a court
before detaining them further?
It is not good enough for government simply to allow the release
of the Bakhtyari children while leaving other children behind the
razor wire because they are out of sight and out of mind. Just last
Thursday I embraced one weeping father in the Baxter detention centre
who cried, "We are so tired, just so tired. Why do my children
have to spend years here in detention while the Bakhtyari children
walk free?" It is not good enough for the government simply
to allow Mr Bakhtyari to leave Baxter on visits to see his wife
and children in Adelaide while other fathers and husbands are left
stranded in Baxter. Of course the Bakhtyari family should walk free
and be reunited here in the Australian community. If they are eventually
proved not to be refugees they should be forced back home (wherever
that may be) only if it is safe and decent to return them. It should
be the same for all asylum seeking families.
Detention centres are no place for kids to spend years of their
lives. Brief detention on arrival or prior to departure may be justified.
But in the meantime, the children should be permitted to walk in
their shoes on our land accompanied by their Mums and Dads while
their asylum claims are processed decently and quickly. As the bells
toll, let's ask ourselves how we have allowed this to happen on
our watch. We may be more afraid but we have no grounds to be afraid
of these children and their families. And we have no right to take
out our fear on them. All they have done is seek asylum, as we would
if we were in their shoes. Let them walk free.
print this page
© 2003 Uniya, PO Box 522,
Kings Cross NSW 1340
Tel: +61 2 9356 3888 Fax: +61 2 9356 3021